Научные исследования экономического факультета. Электронный журнал.

Ключевые слова

A110ANCEAC100CMSCOVID-19COVID-19.Clusters as a Mechanisms of Governance Discrete Structural AlternativeD210D230D240D330D43Digital economyDynaCont-IIEconomic Policy KnotsFamily Violence against Women in Modern RussiaH110K130K21K23K32L11L190L290L310L41L51Market Development and Political EconomyModeling of Development Indicators for Russian Energy Resources MarketsN700O19O330O340O43Opening Address of the Editor-in-ChiefQ330Q51Q55Q56Q57Q58Relevant Aspects of Determination of Efficiency and Effectiveness of Marketing DepartmentSQLScientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal. 2020. Volume 12.Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal. 2021.Volume 13Scientific researches of faculty of economics. Electronic journal.Site newsSpecific of Mergers and Acquisitions in Russian Federation. Management ApproachUTFagri-food exportantitrust policyartificial intelligencebig databrand position-ingbrand valueclustercompany’s strategycompetition policyconscious consumptiondmoeconomic growtheconomic theoryeffectivenessefficiencyenvironmental economicsethical consumptionexchange rateexport restrictionsfamily violencefiscal policygendergeneration Ygeneration Z.hybridinflationinstitutional arrangementslabor marketmachine learningmarket concentration.market developmentmarketing budgetmonetary policynational economic modelpolitical economyprojectsquotationregulationregulatory impact assessmentsocio-demographic characteristicstariff regulationtaxi services marketантимонопольная политикаинтеллектуальный капиталискусственный интеллектмашинное обучениеметодологияполитическая экономияцифровая экономика20092010

Mikhail S. Spektor, Hannah Seidler Violations of economic rationality due to irrelevant information during learning in decision from experience (trans. from Eng. Beletskaya, M. Yu.)

DOI: 10.38050/2078-3809-2022-14-3-100-126


According to normative decision-making theories, the composition of a choice set should not affect people’s preferences regarding the different options. This assumption contrasts with decades of research that have identified multiple situations in which this principle is violated, leading to context effects. Recently, research on context effects has been extended to the domain of experience-based choices, where it has been shown that forgone outcomes from irrelevant alternatives affect preferences — an accentuation effect. More specifically, it has been shown that an option presented in a situation in which its outcomes are salient across several trials is evaluated more positively than in a context in which its outcomes are less salient. In the present study, we investigated whether irrelevant information affects preferences as much as relevant information. In two experiments, individuals completed a learning task with partial feedback. We found that past outcomes from non-chosen options, which contain no relevant information at all, led to the same accentuation effect as did counterfactual outcomes that provided new and relevant information. However, if the information is entirely irrelevant (from options that could not have been chosen), individuals ignored it, thus ruling out a purely perceptual account of the accentuation effect. These results provide further support for the influence of salience on learning and highlight the necessity of mechanistic accounts in decision-making research.

Keywords: accentuation effect, context effects, decision making, decisions from experience, reinforcement learning.

JEL: D91, Z10.

For citation: Mikhail S. Spektor, Hannah Seidler (2022) Violations of economic rationality due to irrelevant information during learning in decision from experience (trans. from Eng. Beletskaya, M. Yu.). Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 100-126. DOI: 10.38050/2078-3809-2022-14-3-100-126